Invoices, remittances and reconciliations handled in spreadsheets and email across tools that do not talk to each other.
Period-end means chasing approvals, matching transactions by hand and correcting errors late, every month.
Missed early-payment terms, DSO nobody can move and no current view of liquidity or working capital.
Point solutions automate tasks. They do not unify the function — and the people in between become the integration layer.
The chief of staff. Reads everything that arrives, decides which agent owns it, tracks it to completion and escalates what it should not decide alone.
Runs the floorJunior specialists, each expert in one job — invoice processing, cash application, collections, reconciliation, close. They work overnight and never context-switch.
Do the workThe senior managers. They see one queue of the cases where judgment matters — a duplicate to reject, a credit memo to approve, a reclass to sign off.
Decide and approveThe institutional memory. Every approval, rejection and correction is recorded as precedent, so the same case is handled without asking next time.
Makes them betterYou are not buying software your team learns to operate. You are hiring a team that already knows the work and improves as it goes.
One data model — an agent in one area sees what happened in the others. One queue — every case needing a human lands in a single action pane. Your ERP stays the system of record.
One human stage. Approval stays with your team; the other nine stages of the lifecycle are the agents' work.
Position, not a report. The cash view is read from applied receipts and open items as they land.
Audit trail by construction. Every entry carries who or what prepared it, on what evidence, and who approved it.
What is our position today, and in three weeks?
If we release this batch Friday instead of Tuesday, what changes?
Which discounts are we about to miss, and what are they worth?
Where did the ageing move this month, and which accounts drove it?
Which customers keep their promises, and which never do?
How much of our DSO is disputes rather than slow payers?
Which vendors generate the most exceptions, and of what kind?
How long does an invoice actually sit waiting for an approver?
Where is our touchless rate falling, and what is holding it back?
Which tasks stall the close, month after month?
How many manual journals are we still posting, and who posts them?
Which accounts carry unexplained differences more than once?
Asked in the same place the work happens. There is no extract, no overnight refresh and no separate reporting stack to keep in step.
One queue for all of finance — no module-hopping. Everything the agents did overnight, and the few things they need from Dana, lands in this one place. The duplicate invoice is held behind a guardrail with the rejection already proposed. All that is left is her call.
Your AI workforce resolved 287 items since yesterday. 4 decisions need you — everything else is moving on its own.
Every agent scores its own work against your master data and rules. Above the line you set, it acts and posts to your ERP. Below it, the item goes to a person with the reasoning attached. Thresholds by process, amount, account and exception type — and segregation of duties stays with your named people.
Autonomy is earned. Most teams start with a low line and a wide review, then raise it category by category as the agents' record becomes clear.
Dana rejected the Anvaya duplicate. Her resolution becomes institutional memory: next time this vendor double-submits, the Invoice Processing Agent resolves it autonomously — and shows her why. The vendor quirk one person knew stops being one person's knowledge.
Work is pulled from wherever it lives — mailbox, portal, EDI, bank file, ERP queue. Nobody uploads anything.
The document is read, not templated: header, lines, tax, intent — whatever layout it arrived in.
Scored against your master data, contracts, tolerances and history. The score is the agent's own confidence.
Above it, the agent posts. Below it, a person decides — and that decision joins shared knowledge.
Illustrative, using Meridian's volumes. The closest real comparison we can name: a leading REIT closed 50% faster with 75% fewer errors and 30% more volume on the same team, across 95+ GL accounts.
Pre-built connectors to major ERPs, banks and document channels. Your ERP remains the system of record throughout — nothing is migrated.
Your chart of accounts, approval matrix, tolerances and thresholds. Unfamiliar document layouts are learned from a handful of examples, not an engineering ticket.
The first process goes live in weeks, not quarters, with a narrow autonomy line and full review. Coverage and autonomy widen from there.
Sequenced, not big-bang. One process area proves itself before the next one starts. Touchless rates climb as the agents absorb your team's resolutions.
150,000 invoices a month, 5,000 suppliers. Fifteen exception types accounted for roughly 90% of what needed handling.
$18M+ to the bottom line, 85% of credit terms rationalised, 74% fewer distinct payment terms in use.
400 offices across 60 countries, with 90+ validations applied before an invoice is posted.
95+ GL accounts reconciled continuously; 30% more volume absorbed by the same team.
Assessed on capability and market impact in finance and accounting automation.
Ranked among the leading providers of intelligent finance operations.
Awarded on verified customer ratings rather than analyst opinion.
Certification covers the platform; the controls that matter day to day are the ones on the governance slide — your thresholds, your approvers, and an explained, attributable record behind every action an agent takes.
Vendor masters have duplicates, POs are missing, coding is inconsistent. The agents work with that and surface it — but the first weeks will show you things about your own data you may not want to see.
Touchless rates in the eighties are the result of months of learning on your specifics, not a launch-day setting. Expect a curve, and hold us to its slope.
Approval, materiality judgment and the relationships behind a disputed invoice belong to your team. The aim is to hand them fewer, better-prepared decisions — not none.
SESSION ONE · 60 MINUTES
Product walkthrough on your chosen area, under NDA.
SESSION TWO · 90 MINUTES
Your volumes and exception mix, mapped to an autonomy plan — what autonomy is realistic in year one.