Proof
Numbers with a customer attached.
Every figure on this site belongs to a real deployment with its scale attached. A number without an operation behind it tells you nothing, so we do not print one.
Featured
Four deployments, four different problems
Alongside 55% touchless straight-through processing and 90+ validations running on every invoice. The remainder went through exception workflows.
5,000 suppliers on one portal. Fifteen exception types accounted for about 90% of everything the agents met. Around a day to process an invoice became about three minutes. RPA had already failed here because the templates kept changing.
75% fewer errors and 30% more volume handled by the same team, month after month, with data spread across spreadsheets, PDFs and proprietary systems.
$525M+ of early-payment opportunity uncovered, 74% fewer payment terms in use, 85% of credit terms rationalised and 14 days off DSO.
Also in production
Two more AP operations, at scale
A 30% improvement in DPO, 75% less time resolving exceptions, and 80%+ invoice coding accuracy, with 80%+ of the workflow touchless.
Retail banner, dropship and carrier channels running at up to 90% straight-through, against SAP, a mainframe and Oracle Transport Management. Up to 500 attachments per email and 2,000 invoices in a single document.
Trusted by
Finance teams already running on it
Recognition
What the analysts say
On naming
Why some of these are anonymous
Where a customer has cleared public use of their name, we use it. Where they have not, we give the industry and the operating scale instead — because the scale is what makes the number mean anything. We do not attach a real number to a vague company, or a vague number to a real one. Every figure on this page comes from a documented deployment.
Questions
Asked before every deployment
Which companies use JIFFYAI FinOps?
Finance teams including McKesson, Volvo, NBCUniversal, Paramount, American Express, FIS, Cushman & Wakefield, Nova Bus, Aubuchon Hardware and alliantgroup, among others. Case-study clients are described by industry and scale where they have not cleared use of their name.
What results have customers actually achieved?
85% straight-through processing in twelve weeks at a top global automaker; 40% AP cost reduction across 400 offices at a global real estate services firm; a 50% faster close with 75% fewer errors at a leading REIT; and $150M+ in free cash flow released at a mining conglomerate.
What size of finance function does this suit?
The deployments here range from 900,000 invoices a year to 95+ GL accounts across 400 offices in 60 countries, and from 58 locations to 5,000 suppliers on one portal.
Are these figures verified?
Each comes from a documented customer deployment and is stated with the operating scale it was achieved at, rather than as a standalone marketing number.
See it running before you decide.
The tour is the product, not a video of it. Walk the floor yourself — no form in front of it.